ISO/IEC 27001 and the other ISO27k standards

ISO/IEC 27001 is an international standard specifying the requirements for Information Security Management Systems, in a succinct, formalized style that makes the standard amenable to conformity auditing and certification. The standard is generic and hence can be applied to all types and sizes of organization, in any industry, anywhere in the world.

A ‘management system’ is described by ISO as “the way in which an organization manages the interrelated parts of its business in order to achieve its objectives.” The approach is designed to feed managers the information they need to oversee, and the governance/management levers necessary to direct, the organization’s activities. As such, the standard stops short of mandating specific information security controls, leaving that to management’s discretion according to its determination of the organization’s information risks.

ISO’s standardized approach is common across its management systems standards such as ISO 9001 (quality management), ISO 14001 (environmental management) and ISO 22301 (business continuity).
Familiarity with any one implies a fundamental appreciation of any other. For example, they all incorporate the concept of continuous improvement, systematically responding to issues and driving maturity in ways that suit the organization's needs.

Information is core to ISO/IEC 27001, in particular risks to an organization’s own information (e.g. accounting data in its financial systems, its trade secrets, and the knowledge and expertise of its workers) plus other information in its care (e.g. personal details about employees, customers and business contacts, and intellectual property such as software licensed or provided by third parties).

Information security involves ensuring adequate levels of confidentiality, integrity and availability of information, protecting the associated systems, networks, services and processes. Maintaining information availability, for instance, is necessary for legitimately exploiting information for business purposes. Integrity covers aspects such as the completeness, accuracy and timeliness of information, and broader concerns such as trustworthiness and reliability. Confidentiality includes secrecy and is a major part of privacy.

Adopting ISO27k secures worthwhile business benefits such as:
  • Protecting valuable information: more specifically, information security enhances the confidentiality, integrity and/or availability of the information content, plus the associated processes, IT systems, networks, services etc., while avoiding excessive security.

  • Consistency: information security includes but extends beyond IT or cybersecurity, addressing risks to all forms of valuable information including intellectual property, proprietary information and personal information.

  • Proportional control: determining how best to deal with information risks (e.g. how urgently, using which resources) depends on a sound appreciation of the nature and significance of those risks, hence risk identification, analysis and evaluation are fundamental.

  • Reducing losses: effective, appropriate security controls minimize the probability and severity of incidents caused deliberately (e.g. hacks, frauds, disinformation) or accidentally (e.g. floods, equipment failures, misconfigurations, inadvertent disclosures).

  • Governance roadmap: faced with bewildering possibilities, the ISO27k standards provide a rational, straightforward structure and approach for senior management to ensure that appropriate information security arrangements are put in place, used and maintained.

  • Increasing assurance and trust: conformity and especially accredited certificaton demonstrates management's commitment towards good practices for information security, privacy, compliance, ethics etc. to interested parties such as the organization's customers, employees, partners, investors and the authorities.

  • Achieving and maintaining compliance: various laws, regulations and contractual terms impose requirements on the organization regarding information security, privacy, accuracy, completeness, timeliness etc. These, along with other business/management requirements, are key objectives driving the ISMS.

  • Enhancing resilience: adequately protecting the information, IT systems and processes that are vital to important operational activities and business objectives reduces the possibility of costly disruptive incidents, adverse publicity, customer defections etc. Cyber-crimes such as ransomware and extortion, for instance, are existential risks to any organization that is reliant on its own information systems, or that relies on suppliers, partners or customers that are IT-dependent – in other words, every organization.

  • Focusing on priorities: using the risk assessment process, significant risks are prioritized for analysis and treatment, while information security controls that are of little to no value can be dropped, releasing resources for other more important things.

  • Strengthening brands: aside from merely claiming to protect information, certified conformity with ISO/IEC 27001 enhances the organization’s reputation and is increasingly being demanded by discerning customers, partners, investors and regulators.

  • Enabling the business: it would be reckless for the organization to run its financial and HR systems, operations, websites etc. without appreciating and limiting the associated information risks to tolerable levels. Information security is not just good for business, it is essential in today’s risky business environment.

  • Proactive adaptation: the ever-changing threats, vulnerabilities and business impacts make information risk management a dynamic challenge. Failing to keep pace with the field means falling behind and being increasingly threatened.

  • Continuous improvement: routine monitoring plus periodic reviews and audits feed back into the information risk management process, driving incremental updates and maturity through improved security, resilience, efficiency, assurance, compliance etc.
ISO/IEC 27001 was last revised in 2022, along with ISO/IEC 27002 (a structured catalog of information security controls) and ISO/IEC 27005 (about the process of managing risks to information). Other standards in the ISO27k series provide futher, more detailed guidance in related areas such as certification, governance, security metrics, cloud security, supply chain security and privacy. Taken as a whole, ISO27k is a well-rounded guide to good information risk and security practices.

Please search www.ISO.org for definitive information on the published standards, and browse www.ISO27001security.com for further details including an extensive FAQ, the ISO27k Forum and a business case paper you can customize to persuade your management to invest in an ISO27001 ISMS, for genuine business reasons. For camera-ready ISMS templates and assistance with any of this, visit www.SecAware.com or get in touch. How can we help?

Popular posts from this blog

Pragmatic ISMS implementation guide (FREE!)

Image
Early this morning ( very  early!) I remotely attended an ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27/WG 1 editing meeting in London discussing the planned revision of ISO/IEC 27003:2017 . Overall, the meeting was very productive in that we got through a  long  list of expert comments on the preliminary draft standard, debated the objectives of the project and the standard and reached consensus on most points. In summary: 27003 is to be revised to align with the current 2022 releases of ISO/IEC 27001 , 27002 and 27005 : These changes are  mostly  minor aside from the new section 6.3 on ISMS changes.
Read more

Two dozen information risks that ISO forgot

Image
Selecting the wrong controls - controls that are inappropriate, ineffective, too costly, impracticable, fragile, unnecessary, counterproductive or whatever, often as a result of blind faith in fads and fashions of the day and FOMO e.g. MFA, AI, cyber Failing to select the right controls - controls that are ideal for the particular situation, both now and in perpetuity, for whatever reason - mostly ignorance and prejudice Selecting and implementing controls at the wrong time or in the wrong way (where 'wrong' includes ineffective, inappropriate, sub-optimal e.g. bolting on controls rather than designing and building them in) Inept and inaccurate identification, analysis and quantification of risk, including reliance on p oor quality (incomplete, inaccurate, out of date, misleading, unreliable ...) information about actual risks, particularly subtle and emerging risks plus those involving deliberate concealment and misdirection e.g. fraud, misinformation, disinformation, propagan
Read more

Philosophical phriday - compliance risk

Image
According to a vendor's promotional video interview I saw recently, the 'cybersecurity compliance burden' has allegedly become so significant that [customer] organisations are eagerly buying [their] software tools and services to help them manage and fulfil their obligations. The vendor's argument goes that, instead of accumulating a ragtag bunch of policies and other controls relating to user Identification and Authentication (I&A), for instance, it makes sense to:  Identify all the cybersecurity-related laws, regulations and standards that apply to the organisation; Examine them for any security control requirements relating to, say, I&A; Rationalise the I&A controls down to the smallest set that satisfies all the requirements - the lowest common denominator; Design, implement, use, manage and maintain those I&A controls; Have the I&A controls checked or audited to gain assurance that the compliance requirements are met.  OK so far? Sounds reasonab
Read more

ISMS internal audit priorities

Image
A thread on the ISO27k Forum sparked my imagination over coffee this morning. Hope had previously asked for assistance with an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 audit plan.  Bhushan offered a lengthy and generally sound response explaining how to use a spreadsheet with tabs to plan and record the audit work performed on 100% of the main body clauses and 50% of the 93 Annex A controls, day-by-day. That's OK ... except it wasn't entirely clear that he was interpreting and elaborating on the standard's actual requirements. ISO/IEC 27001 does not explicitly require, for example, that (as Bhushan stated) "ALL the management system clauses from 4 to 10 AND their sub-clauses need to be listed and audited" in an ISMS internal audit, although evidently he interprets it in that way. In clause 9.2.1, the standard states a requirement for internal audits to provide information on whether the ISMS conforms to the organization’s own requirements for the ISMS plus the requirements of the stan
Read more

Reading between the lines of ISO27001 [L O N G]

Image
ISO/IEC 27001 is a succinct, formally-worded standard for two key reasons: It is deliberately generic, being applicable to all manner of organisations regardless of difference in location/s, size, industry, maturity, structure, information risk and security status ... and so on. In effect, it specifies the lowest common denominator - the things that ALL organisations should be doing to manage their information security controls, as a minimum. The hurdle is set low enough that every organisation ought to find value in designing, implementing and operating an I nformation S ecurity M anagement S ystem as laid out in the standard. It is a certifiable standard, explicitly specifying the characteristics that every certified organisation's ISMS is expected to have. Again, it is a minimal specification with no concept of typical, average or maximum security: that is entirely down to the organisations themselves to determine, following the information risk management processes minimally de
Read more

Passionate dispassion

Image
Someone who is actively involved in, or is managing, an activity is patently not independent of it. They may well make a conscious, rational and determined effort to be objective, dispassionately reviewing evidence etc ., but their subconscious/emotional biases/prejudices and beliefs/value-systems will inevitably influence what they do. With the best will in the world, they will struggle to challenge and assess their past decisions and activities, especially if they were "certain" or "determined" or genuinely believed they were "doing the right thing". Furthermore, it is very hard for anyone to review the things they did not do, decisions they did not make or options they did not even consider. Mostly, they remain out of sight or out of the question.
Read more

45 ISO Management Systems Standards

Image
The ISO website  currently lists 45 published M anagement S ystems S tandards: 1. ISO 7101:2023 Healthcare organization management — Management systems for quality in healthcare organizations — Requirements 2. ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems — Requirements 3. ISO 10012:2003 Measurement management systems — Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment 4. ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes 5. ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use 6. ISO 14298:2021 Graphic technology — Management of security printing processes
Read more

Philosophical phriday - a noncompliance ramble

Image
In a previous philosophical phriday post , I moaned about vendors of security compliance support/management tools and services over-promising and under-delivering - an admittedly biased, even cynical opinion piece about the compliance imperative . A recent article in Corporate Compliance Insights notes that "CISOs are not just defenders against cyber threats but also champions of compliance and operational resilience". Hmmm, are CISOs 'compliance champs', really? Today, I'm discussing alternatives to being compliance-driven. How else can organisations drive their information risk, security and related concerns in a positive direction?
Read more

Adaptive SME security Crowdstrike special

Image
As if on cue, along comes a golden opportunity to consider what the Adaptive SME security  approach has to say regarding the Crowdstrike incident: That's not 20/20 hindsight but foresight: I've picked out the most relevant rows from the security controls table published in the guide 24 hours before the incident.  Although Crowdstrike primarily supplies much larger enterprises than SMEs, the incident could equally have afflicted other security software, or indeed operating systems such as Windows and assorted cloud apps commonly used by SMEs. Regardless of the details, it is a wake-up call, an opportunity to consider and respond to the information risks ... and to adapt , accordingly.
Read more